An incredibly torqued, misinterpreting anti-Dion headline was put up by the Toronto Star. It alleges that a comment he made about how the Green Shift is not the sole plank of his platform, somehow, means that he no longer cares for his key tax reform.
Here's the test. Can the Liberal war room and the Liberal blogosphere check this before it becomes an uncontested assumption by both the media and the Internet? There's no doubt it's a misinterpretation, and a terrible one at that. It should be rebutted, and there's a great case to be made that it MUST be rebutted, to keep the credibility of their campaign.
So far, I've seen three, with counter-effect of Whatzisname living up to the name by abdicating the responsibilities his real name carries as a Big Time Media Analyst.
Will there be more? Can they blitz?
I'm looking forward to finding out.